Recent
Developments That May Affect Your Tax Situation
The tax talk over the past few months has focused mainly on filing
2004 tax returns and, to some extent, tax simplification. That happens
every year during tax season but this year it was even more pronounced
because there were many new tax breaks to consider, including the
new optional sales tax deduction for itemizers, and new tax complications
to avoid. While filing 2004 returns or getting extensions for them
has been in the forefront, there have been other important tax developments
that may affect you, your family, your investments, and your livelihood.
We've summarized the most important new developments below. Please
call our offices for more information about any of these developments
and what steps you should implement to take advantage of favorable
developments and to minimize the impact of those that are unfavorable.
Retirement
plans and bankruptcy. The Supreme Court recently held
that debtors who go bankrupt may be able to keep some or all of
the funds in their traditional IRAs from the reach of their creditors
under a federal bankruptcy exemption. Shortly after this decision,
which did not specifically address whether Roth IRAs can qualify
for the exemption, a massive bankruptcy reform measure containing
many changes on the treatment of employee benefit plans in bankruptcy
was signed into law. One change allows debtors to exempt from the
bankruptcy estate retirement funds in most employer sponsored plans,
and, subject to an overall $1 million cap, in traditional or Roth
IRAs. These changes will take effect on Oct. 17, 2005, but they
don't apply to cases begun before that date.
More guidance on the sales tax deduction. The
IRS has issued more guidance for taxpayers who itemize and make
the election to deduct state and local general sales taxes instead
of state and local income taxes. In addition to explaining the basics
of this new deduction, the guidance covers such items as joint filers
living in different states, separate filers, revocations, and planned
changes to the optional sales tax tables for next year. While the
tax return due date has come and passed, this information can be
quite valuable for individuals who got filing extensions or might
want to file an amended return to change their choice.
New tax breaks for disaster mitigation payments. A
new law was recently enacted that retroactively treats qualified
disaster mitigation payments as exempt from income tax. It also
provides that qualifying sales under certain hazard mitigation programs
are eligible for deferral of gain recognition as involuntary conversions.
Settlement offer for executive stock option scheme.
Executives and companies who participated in an abusive
tax avoidance transaction involving the transfer of stock options
or restricted stock to family controlled entities have until May
23, 2005, to accept a new IRS settlement offer to resolve their
tax issues. Participating executives must report 100% of the compensation
and must pay interest and a 10% penalty. Corporations and executives
must pay appropriate employment taxes but they may deduct their
transaction costs. Corporations can deduct compensation reported
by the executives.
Damages for faulty home construction. An
IRS ruling makes it clear that you generally won't be taxed on any
damages you receive from a builder, architect, or other responsible
party, for faulty construction of your residence. Rather, you reduce
your basis (your cost for tax purposes) for measuring gain or loss
if and when you sell the home. You are, however, taxed currently
to the extent the damages you receive exceed your basis. These rules
apply whether the damages are awarded in a lawsuit or paid in settlement
of a suit.
Like-kind exchanges facilitated. Like-kind
exchanges are popular ways for taxpayers to dispose of appreciated
realty without paying a current tax. However, it may be difficult
for a taxpayer that finds a willing buyer for his property to find
suitable replacement property within the statutory time periods
(identification of replacement property no later than 45 days after
the transfer of the relinquished property, and receipt of the replacement
property within 180 days after the transfer or by the extended due
date of the return for the year of transfer if earlier). One solution
is to replace the relinquished property with an undivided fractional
interest in like-kind realty (also known as a marketable tenancy-in-common
interest). A new IRS ruling supplies a fairly detailed blueprint
for real estate entrepreneurs to follow in structuring undivided
fractional interest ownership arrangements that will pass muster
with the IRS.
No relief for AMT owed from ISO exercise. Many
companies award executives and other key employees options to purchase
the company's stock that qualify as incentive stock options (ISOs).
For regular tax purposes there's no current tax, and, if holding
period requirements are met, the executive's tax bill can be limited
to long-term capital gain on ultimate sale of the stock. However,
there is one large catch-the bargain element on exercise of an ISO
is included in the alternative minimum tax (AMT) tax base. The Tax
Court has held that the IRS did not abuse its discretion when it
rejected a taxpayer's offer in compromise relating to AMT liability
that resulted from his exercise of ISOs in 2000. In this case, the
taxpayer faced a huge AMT liability from his exercise of ISOs and
was left with stock that had dropped precipitously in value after
the exercise. While the Tax Court was sympathetic to his plight,
it found that IRS did not act improperly in denying the offer. This
case is not unique. Many taxpayers who received and exercised ISOs
before the tech bubble burst in 2000 were left holding stock with
little and in some cases no value. Congress has been asked to fix
this problem but thus far has not acted. As the Tax Court pointed
out, any fix must come from Congress, not from the IRS or the Courts.
Commentators have said a fix may not happen unless and until enough
affected individuals convince their legislators to take action.
Tax debts discharged even though returns filed late.
A U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has held that a debtor's
federal tax returns filed after the IRS had assessed the tax liabilities
for the years involved qualified as returns under the bankruptcy
law. The debtor's returns were filed late but he waited more than
two years after filing them before he petitioned for bankruptcy
so he wasn't snared by a bankruptcy rule that excepts from discharge
taxes for which a required return was filed late and within two
years before the bankruptcy petition.
Huge tax gap foreshadows increased enforcement. The
IRS has released preliminary results from a major research project
assessing compliance with the tax laws. The study, which involves
tax year 2001, reveals that the nation has a net tax gap of over
a quarter trillion dollars, which the IRS vows to bring down with
its increasing enforcement efforts. The tax gap has three components:
underreporting of income, underpayment of taxes and non-filing of
returns. Underreporting accounts for more than 80% of the total
tax gap, with non-filing and underpayment at about 10% each.
AMT deduction for refinanced home mortgage interest.
The IRS has clarified that interest paid on a home
mortgage that has been refinanced more than once can qualify to
be deducted (up to a limit) for alternative minimum tax (AMT) purposes
even though the original instructions for Form 6251, Alternative
Minimum Tax-Individuals suggested otherwise. The IRS has reissued
corrected instructions electronically.
Three more hybrid vehicles certified for clean fuel
deduction. The IRS has certified three more model-year
2005 hybrid gas-electric automobiles as being eligible for the clean-burning
fuel deduction: the Honda Insight, Honda Civic Hybrid, and Honda
Accord Hybrid. The original owner of one of these vehicles may claim
a deduction of $2,000 for the year that the vehicle is first put
into use. The IRS had earlier certified the 2005 Ford Escape SUV
and 2005 Toyota Prius.
Home exchange can yield dual tax benefits. An
IRS pronouncement makes it clear that the exchange of a home can
qualify for both the homesale exclusion and like-kind exchange deferral
treatment. This can occur where the property was used as a principal
residence and a business consecutively (e.g., use as a principal
residence followed by rental of the property) or concurrently (a
portion of the home used as a principal residence and a portion
used as a home office).
|